Last week saw the inaugural TechCrunch Europe Awards – baptised the Europas – announce its shortlist and winners. Judging by all the tweets on the day, it sounded like a great bash. I really need to go next year!

The thing that struck me most was the success of entertainment-based services (Spotify, Songkick, Songcloud are just three examples) and specifically the adulation that Spotify received. They were the clear winners on the night. I love seeing European companies getting traction and being rewarded for their success, however, I am a little perplexed that a service like Spotify, which is ultimately just another way of streaming content, had so much success. There is a real question mark over the long term viability of any content delivery service that doesn’t own its content – no matter how brilliantly intuitive or designed it is (and Spotify is both!).

My belief is the future will see us all have access to any music and video, any where and at any time. And the beauty (for consumers) and problem (for content services) with this is that if we can easily access all music on Spotify and We7 and Last.fm and any other newcomer in this space, what stops me from jumping from one to the other depending on what’s cheapest or coolest or best integrated? It’s not like you loose all of your music if you move to the next coolest music or video service, so what is it that keeps me there?

Last.fm developed a music social network, We7 have been attracting users by hosting exclusive content for a limited period and Spotify have focused on the simplicity of their UI and quality of the files. But is this enough to keep the technophile music fans from jumping ship next time another service launches?